Deconstruction (1)

Deconstruction is a term in contemporary philosophy, literary criticism, and the social science, denoting a process by which the texts and languages of Western Philosophy (in particular) appear to shift and complicate in meaning when read in light of the assumptions and absences they reveal within themselves. Jacques Derrida coined the term in the 1960s, and proved more forthcoming with negative, rather than pined-for positive, analyses of the school.

Subjects relevant to deconstruction include the philosophy of meaning in Western thought, and the ways that meaning is constructed by Western writers, texts, and readers and understood by readers. Though Derrida himself denied deconstruction was a method or school of philosophy, or indeed anything outside of reading the text itself, the term has been used by others to describe Derrida's particular methods of textual criticism, which involved discovering, recognizing, and understanding the underlying—and unspoken and implicit—assumptions, ideas, and frameworks that form the basis for thought and belief, for example, in complicating the ordinary division made between nature and culture. Derrida's deconstruction was drawn mainly from the work of Heidegger and his notion of destruktion but also from Levinas and his ideas upon the other.


Dear Pak Pur,

Wow, it is a great piece of writing. I am waiting for another part.

But, actually... do you agree with Derrida in seeing everything from in and out side altogether without considering that at least there is such a border that it is impossible to do any interface.

An anti-deconstructionist
Yup, Tragic hero must not be tragic.

Popular posts from this blog

A Summary of Rolland Barthes' "From Work to Text"

Chaucer's Canterbury Tales" as a Picture of Contemporary Society

I.A.Richards' Two Uses of Language